- Mitglied seit
- 31 Mai 2006
- Beiträge
- 123
- Punkte für Reaktionen
- 0
- Punkte
- 0
Let's say fritzbox 1 has one SIP provider: no "real" phone number, but only a sip address fb1 @ voipuser.org . Fritzbox 2 has one SIP provider: no "real" phone number, but only a sip address fb2 @ voipuser.org .
Fritzbox 1 has a short-dial entry of **700 to reach fritzbox 2 (it is possible to put SIP addresses instead of numbers in the addressbook).
When fritzbox 1 is calling fritzbox 2 in that way, everything works well, except that the Anrufliste does not show the caller-ID (probably because there is no "real" phonenumber, only a SIP address).
However, in the telnet session of fritzbox 2 I can see:
So this mean fritzbox 2 is receiving the correct caller ID (fb1 @ sip.voipuser.org). Is there any reason why AVM decided not to put this in the Anrufliste ?
Or is there a work around?
PS. What does "VoIP led value = 18" mean?
Thanks!
Fritzbox 1 has a short-dial entry of **700 to reach fritzbox 2 (it is possible to put SIP addresses instead of numbers in the addressbook).
When fritzbox 1 is calling fritzbox 2 in that way, everything works well, except that the Anrufliste does not show the caller-ID (probably because there is no "real" phonenumber, only a SIP address).
However, in the telnet session of fritzbox 2 I can see:
May 17 15:28:40 voipd[1014]: local: 8 0 2 102 100 99 97 101
May 17 15:28:40 voipd[1014]: call from sip:fb1 @ sip.voipuser.org to 4
May 17 15:28:40 voipd[1014]: VoIP led value = 18
May 17 15:28:40 voipd[1014]: >>>UDP Status: 100 Trying (7)
May 17 15:28:41 voipd[1014]: alerting(appl=5 plci=0x1005 ncci=0x0 outgoing)
So this mean fritzbox 2 is receiving the correct caller ID (fb1 @ sip.voipuser.org). Is there any reason why AVM decided not to put this in the Anrufliste ?
Or is there a work around?
PS. What does "VoIP led value = 18" mean?
Thanks!